Millholland v. Deer et al
Filing
8
ORDER: The Court overrules Millholland's belated objections, 7 . Magistrate Judge Deere got it right; Millholland's complaint doesn't state any valid constitutional claims. The Court therefore stands by its 4 February 2016 Order and Judgment, 5 & 6 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/8/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY MILLHOLLAND
ADC #500108
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:16-cv-1-DPM
JEFFERY T. DEER, Major, EARU; GAYLON LAY,
Warden, EARU; DORSEY A. LEE, SR., Correctional
Sergeant, EARU; TERRIE L. BANISTER, Disciplinary
Hearing Officer, ADC; RAYMOND NAYLOR,
Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, ADC; WENDY
KELLEY, Director, ADC; and ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On de novo review, the Court overrules Millholland’s belated objections,
№ 7. Magistrate Judge Deere got it right; Millholland’s complaint doesn’t state
any valid constitutional claims. The Court therefore stands by its 4 February
2016 Order and Judgment, № 5 & 6.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
8 February 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?