Winnett v. Bray et al

Filing 121

ORDER approving and adopting the 115 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and granting in part and denying in part the 68 motion to dismiss filed by separate defendants Dean Yancey and Arlen Parham. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/2/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DONALD F. WINNETT ADC #139544 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:16-cv-00013-KGB-BD ALEX BRAY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received and reviewed a Partial Recommended Disposition filed by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 115). After careful review of plaintiff Donald Winnett’s timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 115). The motion to dismiss filed by separate defendants Dean Yancey and Arlen Parham is granted in part and denied in part (Dkt. No. 68). To the extent that Mr. Yancey and Mr. Parham move to dismiss Mr. Winnett’s claims under the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000cc, et seq., their motion is denied. To the extent that Mr. Yancey and Mr. Parham move to dismiss Mr. Winnett’s claims for money damages against them in their official capacities, their motion is granted. Mr. Winnett’s claims for injunctive relief against Mr. Yancey and Mr. Parham in their official capacities may proceed. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2016. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?