Turner et al v. Key et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 11 Motion. The third amended complaint must be filed by 7/29/2016. The State Defendants' motion to dismiss, 12 , is denied without prejudice as moot. Motion 20 , granted. Fitz Hall and Ouida Newton have replaced Toyce Newton and Vicki Saviers on the State Board of Education. The Court directs the Clerk to amend the docket accordingly. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/22/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CURTIS TURNER, Individually and as Superintendent of the Mineral Springs School District, et al. v. PLAINTIFFS No. 2:16-cv-29-DPM JOHNNY KEY, Individually and as Commissioner of the Arkansas Department of Education, a State Agency, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. The Plaintiffs want to amend their complaint again to shore up their pleading against Hempstead County and to remove some claims against the State Defendants. The State Defendants don't really oppose this amendment; but they want the Court to rule on their motion to dismiss first. The ends of justice favor allowing the amendment. And despite the inconvenience to the State Defendants, it's more efficient to move this case forward as a whole, not in pieces. The motion, NQ 11, is therefore granted. FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2). The third amended complaint must be filed by 29 July 2016. The State Defendants' motion to dismiss, NQ 12, is denied without prejudice as moot. Given that the case will be moving forward on the fourth version of the complaint, the Court is unlikely to allow any more substantive changes in the claims. It's time to get to the merits. 2. Motion, NQ 20, granted. Fitz Hall and Ouida Newton have replaced Toyce Newton and Vicki Saviers on the State Board of Education. The Court directs the Clerk to amend the docket accordingly. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(d). So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. v UniledS~~sD~trict~d~ :l. t> I (o -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?