Wright v. Warner et al
Filing
12
ORDER adopting the 11 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; denying plaintiff Wright's 1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; denying plaintiff's 3 motion to appoint counsel; and dismissing without prejudice plai ntiff's 2 complaint. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk within 10 days of the date of this Order. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/2/2016. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN KIRBY WRIGHT,
ADC #99769
v.
PLAINTIFF
2:16CV00083-JLH-JTK
MIKE WARNER, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff Wright’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Document #1.
2.
Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of
$400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this
Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the
case will be reopened.
3.
Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED. Document #3.
4.
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2016.
_________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?