Martin v. Rivera et al
ORDER approving and adopting the 5 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing, with prejudice, Mr. Martin's claims based on his failure to state a constitutional claim; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/2/2016. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PATRICK RAY MARTIN,
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00098 JM/BD
C.V. RIVERA, et al.
The Court has received the Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed
by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. Mr. Martin has not filed any objections. After careful
review of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be,
and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Mr. Martin’s claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on his failure to state
a constitutional claim. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this
dismissal would be frivolous and that this dismissal constitutes a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of August, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?