Pettit v. United States District Court et al

Filing 3

ORDER finding that the interests of justice would best be served by transferring this case and directing the Clerk of the Court to immediately transfer Plaintiff's entire case file to the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The 2 order dated 10/08/2016 is hereby set aside. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/28/2016. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION MICHAEL E. PETTIT V. PLAINTIFF 2:16CV00102 JM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, District of Utah; UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Michael E. Pettit has submitted this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case for filing in this District. However, from the facts alleged and the Defendants named, it appears that venue properly lies in the District of Utah. 28 U.S.C. §1391(b). Accordingly, the Court finds that the interests of justice would best be served by transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of Utah. 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court is directed to IMMEDIATELY TRANSFER PLAINTIFF’S ENTIRE CASE FILE to the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The order dated October 8, 2016 (Docket No. 2) is hereby set aside. DATED this 28th day of November, 2016. ___________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 “The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” Id.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?