Cade v. Rivera
Filing
22
ORDER adopting 18 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Cade's petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying the requested relief. Cade must petition the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for permission to file a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 2255(h)(2). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/1/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
EDWARD EUGENE CADE
v.
PETITIONER
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00131 BSM
C.V. RIVERA, Warden,
FCC Forrest City, Arkansas
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 18] from United States
Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. Petitioner Edward Cade has filed
his objections [Doc. No. 21]. Upon de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and
recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Cade’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus
is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the requested relief
is denied. Cade must petition the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for
permission to file a successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 2255(h)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of June 2017.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?