Williams v. Little Rock District Court

Filing 9

ORDER adopting in their entirety in all respects the 4 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing without prejudice Petitioner Antonieo Williams' 2 petition for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order; finding all other pending motions as moot; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/8/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION ANTONIEO WILLIAMS ADC #103905 VS. PETITIONER 2:16-CV-00133-BRW LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT COURT RESPONDENT ORDER I have received the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed.1 After careful consideration, I adopt as my findings in all respects the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner Antonieo Williams’ petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order. All other pending motions are MOOT. I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2016. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Objections were due Monday, December 5, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?