Bush v. Davis et al
ORDER adopting 4 the partial recommended disposition; dismissing, without prejudice, plaintiff Kenneth Bush's claims against defendant Wendy Kelley, but allowing him to proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against the remaining defendants; granting 5 Bush's motion for an extension of time to file objections; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00160 BSM
RODERICK D. DAVIS, et al.
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 4] and plaintiff Kenneth Bush’s objections [Doc. No. 6] have
been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, Bush’s claims against defendant Wendy Kelley are dismissed without
prejudice, but he may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against the remaining
defendants. Bush’s motion for an extension of time to file objections [Doc. No. 5] is granted,
and his objections [Doc. No. 6] have been reviewed as being timely filed. It is certified that
an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?