Bush v. Davis et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 the partial recommended disposition; dismissing, without prejudice, plaintiff Kenneth Bush's claims against defendant Wendy Kelley, but allowing him to proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against the remaining defendants; granting 5 Bush's motion for an extension of time to file objections; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
KENNETH BUSH
ADC #088682
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00160 BSM

RODERICK D. DAVIS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 4] and plaintiff Kenneth Bush’s objections [Doc. No. 6] have
been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, Bush’s claims against defendant Wendy Kelley are dismissed without
prejudice, but he may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against the remaining
defendants. Bush’s motion for an extension of time to file objections [Doc. No. 5] is granted,
and his objections [Doc. No. 6] have been reviewed as being timely filed. It is certified that
an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE