Odom v. Does

Filing 38

ORDER approving and adopting in part the 30 Partial Recommended Disposition. Because the objections set out Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay, they are not dismissed. The objections will be considered an addendum to his amended complaint and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the amended complaint and the objections on Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Wright, Culver, Smith and the Doe defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/20/2017. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLES POWELL ODOM,
ADC #136145
VS.

PLAINTIFF
2:17-CV-00020 BRW/BD

DOES, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After a careful consideration of the Recommendation and Mr.
Odom’s timely objections, and after a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the the
Recommendation in part.
Because the objections set out Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and
Lay, they are not dismissed. The objections will be considered an addendum to his amended
complaint and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of both the amended complaint
and the objections on Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay (Doc. Nos. 25, 37).
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Wright, Culver, Smith, and the Doe defendants are
DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 20th day of April, 2017.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE