Odom v. Does

Filing 38

ORDER approving and adopting in part the 30 Partial Recommended Disposition. Because the objections set out Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay, they are not dismissed. The objections will be considered an addendum to his amended complaint and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the amended complaint and the objections on Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Wright, Culver, Smith and the Doe defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/20/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CHARLES POWELL ODOM, ADC #136145 VS. PLAINTIFF 2:17-CV-00020 BRW/BD DOES, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After a careful consideration of the Recommendation and Mr. Odom’s timely objections, and after a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the the Recommendation in part. Because the objections set out Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay, they are not dismissed. The objections will be considered an addendum to his amended complaint and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of both the amended complaint and the objections on Defendants Dykeus, Dean, and Lay (Doc. Nos. 25, 37). Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Wright, Culver, Smith, and the Doe defendants are DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 20th day of April, 2017. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?