Hamilton v. USA et al

Filing 12

ORDER partly adopting and partly declining without prejudice 6 Recommendation. The Court returns this case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, including handling Hamilton's pending 8 Motion to amend his complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/25/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION TONY L. HAMILTON Reg #12422-017 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:17-cv-22-DPM-JTK USA; and K. BRISTER, Officer, Individually and in official capacities DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. On de nova review, the Court partly adopts the recommendation, and partly declines it, returning some issues to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). 2. The Court sustains Hamilton's objections about his retaliatory-threat claim. Ng 10 at 3. Threats made in retaliation for using the grievance procedure can state a claim. E.g., Burgess v. Moore, 39 F.3d 216, 218 (8th Cir. 1994). This claim, Ng 2 at 2-3, needs screening and a further recommendation. 3. The Magistrate Judge correctly pointed out that Hamilton's FTCA claim for assault is explicitly exempted from the statutory sovereign immunity waiver. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2680(h). And the defamation claim is likewise exempted. McAdams v. Reno, 64 F.3d 1137, 1144-45 (8th Cir. 1995). But the statute doesn't exempt a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Raz v. United States, 343 F.3d 945, 948 (8th Cir. 2003). This claim, NQ 2 at 2, 10-11, needs screening and a recommendation, too. 4. Hamilton's state law claims should remain in the case until the Court decides whether Hamilton has stated any federal claims for retaliatory threats or intentional infliction of emotional distress. All of Hamilton's other claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. * * * Recommendation, NQ 6, partly adopted and partly declined without prejudice. The Court returns this case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, including handling Hamilton's pending motion to amend his complaint, NQ 8. So Ordered. fr. D .P. Marshall United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?