Johnston v. Chaney et al
ORDER ADOPTING 59 Recommended Disposition. Defendants' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied based on the arguments presented in their motion. Johnston's claims against defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/28/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
AVERY WAYNE JOHNSTON
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00060 BSM
J. CHANEY, et al.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth
Deere [Doc. No. 59] and plaintiff Avery Johnston’s objections [Doc. No. 62] have been
reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in
its entirety. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 37] is denied
based on the arguments presented in their motion. Nevertheless, Johnston’s claims against
defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, for Johnston’s failure to exhaust administrative
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?