Daughenbaugh v. Beasley

Filing 5

ORDER approving and adopting 3 Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; and dismissing without prejudice 1 Mr. Daughenbaugh's petition for writ of habeas corpus and the requested relief is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/2018. (cmn) (Docket entry modified on 1/11/2018 to correct the file date)(jak)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION COLE JOHN DAUGHENBAUGH PETITIONER v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00088-KGB/JTR G. BEASLEY, Warden RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 3). Plaintiff Cole John Daughenbaugh filed an untimely objection to the Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 4). After careful consideration of the Recommended Disposition, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 3). Even if this Court considers the untimely objection, Mr. Daughenbaugh presents no new record evidence or legal argument in his objection. If the Court considers the untimely objection, along with Judge Ray’s Recommended Disposition and the record as a whole, the Court concludes, like Judge Ray, that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to consider Mr. Daughenbaugh’s challenge to the sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. It is therefore ordered that: 1. Mr. Daughenbaugh’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice, and the requested relief is denied (Dkt. No. 1). 2. A certificate of appealability is denied. So ordered this the 10th day of January, 2018. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?