Woods v. Rivera et al

Filing 40

ORDER partly adopting and partly denying 38 Recommendation. 28 Motion for summary judgment partly granted and partly denied without prejudice. Wood's individual-capacity claims against Beasley will be dismissed without prejudice; and his dam ages claims against Beasley in his official capacity will be dismissed with prejudice. The Court returns the declaratory and injunctive relief claims against Beasley in his official capacity to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings and a supplemental recommendation, if appropriate. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/16/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT WOODS Reg. #25154-076 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:17-cv-98-DPM-JJV CARLOS RIVERA, Former Warden, Forrest City Correctional Complex; GENE BEASLEY, Warden, FCCC; WILLIAMS, Nurse, FCCC; CAPPS, Doctor, FCCC; TINDALE, Doctor, FCCC; and BRADSHAW, C-2 Unit Counselor, FCCC DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 38, partly adopted and partly declined. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion for summary judgment, NQ 28, partly granted and partly denied without prejudice. Wood's individual-capacity claims against Beasley will be dismissed without prejudice; and his damages claims against Beasley in his official capacity will be dismissed with prejudice. But Woods also requests declaratory and injunctive relief against Beasley in his official capacity. These claims present a more nuanced sovereign-immunity question. E.g., 5 U.S.C. ยง 702; Raz v. Lee, 343 F.3d 936, 938 (8th Cir. 2003); see also Simmat v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 413 F.3d 1225, 1230-33 (10th Cir. 2005). The Court therefore returns these claims to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings and a supplemental recommendation, if appropriate. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?