Wyles v. Andrews et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the 6 pending recommendation as supplemented; overruling 7 Wyles's objection; and dismissing his claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/4/2018. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION BOBBY RAY WYLES, JR ADC #149401 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:17-cv-202-DPM ANDREWS, Warden, EARU; JUSTINE MINOR, Disciplinary Hearing Judge, ADC; and RHODES, Correctional Officer, EARU DEFENDANTS ORDER On de nov a review, the Court adopts the p ending recommendation as supplemented, NQ 6, and overrules Wyles' s objection, NQ7. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The thrust of Wyles' s argument is that, after being granted or approved for parole, he was deprived of it in a disciplinary hearing that he wasn't allowed to attend. He underlines that this disciplinary hearing took place contrary to prison policy and state law. As a result, Wyles was not released and remains imprisoned. He also lost good-time credits, received a lesser classification level, and endured punitive isolation. Although the alleged facts and timeline are troubling, there is no liberty interest at stake as a matter of law. Classification level, punitive isolation, good-time credits, and policy violations are important but insufficient. N g 6 at 3-4. Even parole denial doesn' t trigger due process protections. There's no liberty interest or constitutional right to release before the end of a valid sentence. Greenholtz v . Inmates ofN ebraska Penal and Correctional Complex , 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979). And Arkansas law doesn' t provide Wyles with a protectable interest. Parker v. Carrothers, 750 F.2d 653, 655-57 (8th Cir. 1984). Therefore his claims will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. t/ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?