Wyles v. Andrews et al
Filing
8
ORDER adopting the 6 pending recommendation as supplemented; overruling 7 Wyles's objection; and dismissing his claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/4/2018. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
BOBBY RAY WYLES, JR
ADC #149401
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:17-cv-202-DPM
ANDREWS, Warden, EARU;
JUSTINE MINOR, Disciplinary
Hearing Judge, ADC; and RHODES,
Correctional Officer, EARU
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On de nov a review, the Court adopts the p ending recommendation
as supplemented, NQ 6, and overrules Wyles' s objection, NQ7. FED. R.
CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The thrust of Wyles' s argument is that, after being
granted or approved for parole, he was deprived of it in a disciplinary
hearing that he wasn't allowed to attend.
He underlines that this
disciplinary hearing took place contrary to prison policy and state law.
As a result, Wyles was not released and remains imprisoned. He also
lost good-time credits, received a lesser classification level, and
endured punitive isolation.
Although the alleged facts and timeline are troubling, there is no
liberty interest at stake as a matter of law. Classification level, punitive
isolation, good-time credits, and policy violations are important but
insufficient. N g 6 at 3-4. Even parole denial doesn' t trigger due process
protections. There's no liberty interest or constitutional right to release
before the end of a valid sentence. Greenholtz v . Inmates ofN ebraska Penal
and Correctional Complex , 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979). And Arkansas law doesn' t
provide Wyles with a protectable interest. Parker v. Carrothers, 750 F.2d
653, 655-57 (8th Cir. 1984). Therefore his claims will be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be
taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
t/
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?