Robinson v. Andrews et al

Filing 27

ORDER adopting 15 partial recommendation and overruling 21 Objections. Robinson's claim that Andrews, Goodman, Smith, Davis, and Brown were deliberately indifferent to his mental health needs goes forward under the imminent danger exception. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All other claims and defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/26/2018. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER BLAIR DESHAUN ROBINSON,
ADC #164517

PLAINTIFF

No. 2:18-cv-44-DPM-BD

v.

ANDREWS, Warden, EARU, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation,
NQ 15, and overrules Robinson's objections, NQ 21. F ED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

In his objections, Robinson includes more facts about certain defendants.
But if Robinson wants to add facts, then he must do so in a motion to
amend his complaint- not in his objections. Robinson's claim that
Andrews, Goodman, Smith, Davis, and Brown were deliberately
indifferent to his mental health needs goes forward under the imminent
danger exception. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All other claims and defendants
are dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall J
(.
United States District Judge