Terry v. Andrews et al
ORDER adopting 7 23 recommended dispositions; dismissing with prejudice Terry's official capacity claims and dismissing without prejudice his claim that defendant Perry violated prison policy; denying as moot 16 Defendant Kelly's motio n to dismiss; dismissing without prejudice and dismissing from this action Terry's claims against defendants Andrews, Straughn, Dycus, Branch, Woods, and Kelly. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/13/2020. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JARELL D. TERRY
JEREMY ANDREWS, et al.
After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Vole’s
recommended dispositions [Doc. Nos. 7, 23] are adopted. Accordingly, Terry’s official
capacity claims are dismissed with prejudice and his claim that defendant Perry violated
prison policy is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Kelly’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No.
16] is denied as moot. Terry’s claims against defendants Andrews, Straughn, Dycus, Branch,
Woods, and Kelly are dismissed without prejudice and those defendants are dismissed from
An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28
U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2020.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?