Faassen v. Larry

Filing 6

ORDER granting 5 Mr. Faassen's motion to dismiss; dismissing the action without perjudice; and denying, as moot, 3 first motion to extend time. Signed by Chief Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/28/2024. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DELTA DIVISION
CHARLES WILLIAM FAASSEN
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 2:23-cv-00225 KGB

JUSTIN CARTER LARRY

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff Charles William Faassen’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 5).
Mr. Faassen’s attorney, Keith Garrett, acknowledges the Court’s Order directing him to refile his
motion for admission pro hac vice and affirms his intent to comply with Local Rule 83.5(d) of the
Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
(Id.). The Court construes this affirmation, along with Mr. Garrett’s previous motion, to constitute
a valid motion for admission pro hac vice and permits Mr. Garrett to represent Mr. Faassen in this
matter. However, Mr. Faassen now wishes to dismiss without prejudice the action due to an
inability to serve the defendant (Id.). Mr. Faassen’s dismissal complies with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Mr. Faassen’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 5). The
Court dismisses without prejudice the action and denies as moot the first motion to extend time
(Dkt. No. 3).
So ordered this 28th day of August, 2024.

Kristine G. Baker
Chief United States District Judge