Ribardi v. Does

Filing 39

ORDER approving and adopting 32 Partial Recommended Disposition as its findings and conclusions in all respects; denying 31 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/8/2025. (ajj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DELTA DIVISION
JARED RIBARDI
ADC #183305
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 2:24-cv-00067-LPR-BBM

DOES, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (PRD) from United States
Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore (Doc. 32). No objections have been filed, and the time for
doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the PRD, along with careful consideration of the
entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the PRD as its findings and conclusions
in all respects.1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 31) is DENIED.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January 2025.
_______________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Subsequent to the PRD being entered, Plaintiff has filed several documents. None of them is an objection. In any
event, to the extent one or all of them could possibly be construed as an objection, the Court has considered them and
found them unpersuasive.