Lane v. King et al

Filing 19

ORDER adopting #16 partial recommended disposition; allowing Adam Lane to proceed with his claims against King, Jackson, Richardson, Taylor, Lane, Graham, Watsin, Mitchell, Hammock, Davis, Stroughn, and Payne arising from King's use of force on 2/11/2024; dismissing all other claims without prejudice as improperly joined; and dismissing without prejudice Mills and McFarland as parties. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/9/2024. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION ADAM LANE ADC #155843 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00097-BSM-JJV JOSEPHUS J. KING, JR., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe’s partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 16] is adopted. Adam Lane is allowed to proceed with his claims against King, Jackson, Richardson, Taylor, Lane, Graham, Watsin, Mitchell, Hammock, Davis, Stroughn, and Payne arising from King’s use of force on February 11, 2024. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice as improperly joined. Mills and McFarland are dismissed without prejudice as parties. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2024. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?