Brown v. Richardson et al

Filing 4

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 3 Order, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment & the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 6/25/07. (jct)

Download PDF
Brown v. Richardson et al Doc. 4 Case 3:07-cv-00082-GTE Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KENNETH E. BROWN V. 3:07CV00082 GTE PLAINTIFF MIKE RICHARDSON, Investigator, Prosecuting Attorney's Office; BRUCE HARLAN, Prosecuting Attorney; JOHN FOGELMAN, Circuit Court Judge; DAVID BURNETTE, Circuit Court Judge; JOHN BRADLEY, Public Defender; and MIKKE MARSHALL Public Defender DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 25th day of June, 2007. __/s/ Garnett Thomas Eisele___________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?