Brown v. Richardson et al

Filing 4

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 3 Order, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment & the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 6/25/07. (jct)

Brown v. Richardson et al

Doc. 4

Case 3:07-cv-00082-GTE

Document 4

Filed 06/25/2007

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KENNETH E. BROWN V. 3:07CV00082 GTE PLAINTIFF

MIKE RICHARDSON, Investigator, Prosecuting Attorney's Office; BRUCE HARLAN, Prosecuting Attorney; JOHN FOGELMAN, Circuit Court Judge; DAVID BURNETTE, Circuit Court Judge; JOHN BRADLEY, Public Defender; and MIKKE MARSHALL Public Defender

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 25th day of June, 2007.

__/s/ Garnett Thomas Eisele___________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com