Brown v. Crittenden County Sheriff Department et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending the Court to grant 176 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss & recommending the dismissal of Plaintiff's claims without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) & Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to comply with 172 Order entered 11/17/08. Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/30/09. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS J O N E S B O R O DIVISION
J E F F E R Y BROWN V. C A S E NO. 3:07-CV-00083-SWW-BD
P L A IN T IF F
C R I T T E N D E N COUNTY S H E R I F F 'S DEPARTMENT, et al.
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e s for Filing Objections The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Ju d g e Susan Webber Wright. Any party may serve and file written objections to this re c o m m e n d a tio n . Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal b a sis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that f in d in g and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your o b je c tio n s must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later th a n eleven (11) days from receipt of the recommendations. A copy will be furnished to th e opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to a p p e al questions of fact. From this submission, the District Judge will determine the n e c es s ity for an evidentiary hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the D is tric t Judge.
M a il your objections and request for a hearing to:
C lerk , United States District Court E a ste rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325 II. B a c k gro u n d T h is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action was removed to federal court on June 21, 2007, after P la in tif f filed it initially in the Circuit Court of Crittenden County on May 18, 2007. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On November 14, 2008, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address indicating that h e is no longer incarcerated (#169). Accordingly, on November 17, 2008, the Court o rd e re d that Plaintiff file a status update or current request to proceed in forma pauperis w ith in thirty days to proceed with this action (#172). Plaintiff was notified that failure to c o m p ly with the Court's order could result in dismissal of his case. Plaintiff has not re sp o n d e d to the Court's Order and has not filed a status update or current request to p ro c e ed in forma pauperis within the time allowed. Pending now is Defendants' motion to dismiss this action based upon Plaintiff's f a ilu re to comply with the Court's Order (#176). Plaintiff has not responded to D ef en d an ts ' motion. Based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order, P la in tif f 's motion (#176) should be GRANTED.
C o n c lu s io n T h e Court recommends that the District Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss
(# 1 7 6 ) and dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and F e d e ra l Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to comply with the Court's Order of N o v em b er 17, 2008 (#172). D A T E D this 30th day of January, 2009.
____________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?