Lee v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Company LLP et al

Filing 49

ORDER striking 44 Motion for Reconsideration, to Intervene & for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief of non-party movants Jonathan Lee Riches, Lionel Messi & Sheila Taormina; granting 46 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Non-Party Motion. The Clerk of the Court is directed to no longer accept any filings from Jonathan Lee Riches, in any case, without approval from the Court. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/26/09. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION DANNY LEE v. CASE NO. 3:07CV00098 BSM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL COMPANY LLP and NUCOR CORPORATION ORDER Pending before the court are movant Jonathan Lee Riches's Motion for Reconsideration, to Intervene, and for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief [Doc. No. 44] and defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Non-party Motion to Intervene [Doc. No. 46]. Mr. Jonathan Lee Riches, an inmate at FCI Williamsburg, South Carolina, is notorious for filing frivolous cases and motions.1 In the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas, Mr. Riches has filed two frivolous cases and five frivolous motions to intervene. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to no longer accept any filings from Mr. Jonathan Lee Riches, in any case, without approval from the Court. Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Non-party Motion to Intervene is granted and movant Jonathan Lee Riches's Motion for Reconsideration, to Intervene, and for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief is STRUCK from the record. Mr. Riches has filed 605 cases in South Carolina alone. See Ed Schmidt Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Co., No. 3:04-CV-7621, 2008 WL 4925775 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 4, 2008) (finding that Mr. Riches "has filed over 1,000 lawsuits since January 6, 2006"). 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2009. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?