Peel v. Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 12 Defendant's Motion to Remand. All other pending motions are hereby rendered moot. This is a "sentence four" remand w/o prejudice to Plaintiff's subsequent filing for attorney's fees under the EAJA. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/7/08. (jct) (copy forwarded to ALJ and H&A)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
ROBERT PEEL v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration 3:07CV00157 JTR
ORDE R Defendant has filed a Motion to Remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995). In pertinent part, this statutes provides the following: The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and to issue a new decision. Defendant indicates that Plaintiff's counsel was contacted and authorized Defendant to state that the Motion was not opposed. Under the circumstances, a sentence four remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Remand (docket entry #12) is hereby GRANTED. All other pending motions are hereby rendered moot. This is a "sentence four" remand. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's subsequent filing for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. DATED this 7th day of October, 2008.
___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?