Henry v. Premcor Refining Group Inc
Filing
112
ORDER ADOPTING 101 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge H. David Young in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Therefore, 80 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Premcor Refining Group Inc is granted; 81 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Flash Oil Company of Arkansas Inc is denied. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 9/29/09. (jct)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TIM HENRY VS. 3:07CV00158-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
THE PREMCOR REFINING GROUP, INC.
THE PREMCOR REFINING GROUP, INC. VS. FLASH OIL COMPANY OF ARKANSAS, INC. ORDER
THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF
THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. DATED this 29th day of September, 2009.
/s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
