Farrow et al v. Sammis et al
Filing
69
ORDER denying 67 Deborah Farrow's Motion for Reconsideration of 64 Order striking her notice of appeal & denying her motion to file a late appeal. Farrow's motion is denied for the reasons set forth in the Order striking her notice of appeal. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/22/2011. (jct)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
DEBORAH FARROW, et al.
v.
PLAINTIFFS
CASE NO. 3:07CV00189 BSM
ERIK SAMMIS, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff Deborah Farrow moves [Doc. No. 67] for reconsideration of the order [Doc.
No. 64] striking her notice of appeal and denying her motion to file a late appeal. Farrow’s
current motion, however, simply reargues her previous motion.
Farrow’s motion for
reconsideration [Doc. No. 67] is therefore denied for the reasons set forth in the order
striking her notice of appeal.
Dated this 22nd day of November 2011.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
