Seldon v. Johnson

Filing 34

ORDER directing plaintiff to respond to 32 defendants' MOTION to Dismiss on, or before, 9/30/08, explaining why her complaint should not be dismissed as argued by defendants. Failure to respond may result in dismissal without prejudice of her complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/5/08. (jct)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

DOROTHY M. SELDON VS. RICK JOHNSON CASE NO. 3:08CV000033

PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANTS

ORDE R Pending is defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed on August 11, 2008. Plaintiff who is proceeding pro se has not responded to the pending motion as required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is set for a jury trial in Jonesboro at 9:00 a.m. during the week of March 9, 2009. Plaintiff is directed to respond to the pending motion on, or before, September 30, 2008, explaining why her complaint should not be dismissed as argued by defendant. Failure to respond may result in dismissal without prejudice of her complaint pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas for failure to defend. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 day of September, 2008.

James M. Moody United States District Judge