Johnson v. Boyd et al

Filing 87

ORDER ADOPTING 85 REPORT AND PARTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the John Doe Defendants are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to a lack of service, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.4(m). The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/23/09. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JONATHON B. JOHNSON ADC #140542 V. 3:08CV00084 SWW/JTR PLAINTIFF LARRY ZANE BOYD, Administrator, Crittenden County Detention Center, et al. ORDE R DEFENDANTS The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The John Doe Defendants are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to a lack of service, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), than an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 23rd day of April, 2009. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?