Baldwin v. Christensen et al
ORDER denying w/o prejudice 12 Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery; granting 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff is directed to provide Defendants with answers to the discovery requests by 5:00 p.m. on 4/30/09. If Defendants are not satisfied with Plaintiff's responses to the discovery, they may refile the motion to compel. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 4/16/09. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION MIKE BALDWIN v. SEAN CHRISTENSEN AND STAR TRANSPORT, INC. ORDER Pending are Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. No. 12) and Plaintiff's Belated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff seeks a 14 day extension to respond to Defendants' discovery requests because Plaintiff's counsel was unaware of the discovery and unaware that Defendants had filed the motion to compel.1 It appears there was an issue with Plaintiff's counsel's correct mailing address.2 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to provide Defendants with answers to the discovery requests by 5:00 p.m., Thursday, April 30, 2009. Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery is DENIED without prejudice. If Defendants are not satisfied with Plaintiff's responses to the discovery, then they may refile the motion to compel. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2009. 3:08-CV-00162-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Doc. No. 16. Id. (Plaintiff's counsel's mailing address changed in January, 2009).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?