Hill v. Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 13 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand. This case is hereby remanded as a "sentence four" remand for further development of the record and, if necessary, for a hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/14/09. (jct) (copy forwarded to ALJ and H&A)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS J O N E S B O R O DIVISION R O S E M A R Y HILL, o n behalf of S.S., a minor V. CASE NO. 3:08CV166 BD P L A IN T IF F
M I C H A E L J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER
P e n d in g is Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand (docket entry # 1 3 ) . Defendant certifies that Plaintiff does not object to the motion. For good cause s h o w n , Defendant's motion (#13) is GRANTED. This case is hereby remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further d e v e lo p m e n t of the record and, if necessary, for a hearing. Specifically, the A d m in is tra tiv e Law Judge should: (a) utilize a medical expert to provide a medical o p in io n regarding Plaintiff's impairment and functional limitations, (b) evaluate whether P la in tif f 's impairment results in one or more functional limitations, (c) provide a detailed e v a lu a tio n regarding whether Plaintiff's impairment meets or equals the medical criteria in Listing 107.05 of the Appendix 1 Listing of Impairments, and (d) re-evaluate P la in t if f ' s subjective allegations and complaints. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2009.
___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?