Woods v. Ryerson

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order; denying 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/23/08. (jct) Modified on 5/19/2009 to reflect ORDER SET ASIDE PER 10 ORDER; CASE REOPENED (jct).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION OSCAR WOODS, JR. v. RYERSON ORDER On November 20, 2008, an order was entered directing plaintiff to file a supplemental application to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 3 ]. Plaintiff was ordered to address certain deficiencies within twenty days. He was informed that his failure to comply with the order would result in the dismissal of his complaint. The time for filing a supplemental application has passed and plaintiff has not filed a supplemental application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 1] is hereby denied and his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of December, 2008. CASE NO. 3:08-CV-00185 BSM DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?