Bedford v. Flash Market Inc
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential discovery in this cause of action; granting 13 Joint MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/3/09. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION THERESSA BEDFORD v. FLASH MARKET, INC. 3:08-CV-00192-SWW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Whereas, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality and Protective Order ("parties"), have stipulated that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential, and have agreed to the terms of this Order; accordingly, it is this 3rd day of December, 2009, ORDERED: 1. Scope. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery
requests and all deposition testimony and deposition exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively "documents") will be subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth below. 2. Form and Timing of Designation. Confidential documents will be so designated
by placing or affixing the word "CONFIDENTIAL" on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the confidential designation. Documents will be designated confidential prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the documents. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents without prior designation as confidential will not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as confidential as otherwise allowed by this Order. 3. Documents Which May be Designated Confidential. Any party may designate
documents as confidential but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good
faith, determined that the documents contain information protected from disclosure by statute, sensitive personal information, trade secrets, or confidential research, development, or commercial information. Information or documents which are available in the public sector may not be designated as confidential. 4. Depositions. Portions of depositions will be deemed confidential only if designated
as such when the deposition is taken or within 14 business days after receipt of the transcript. Such designation will be specific as to the portions to be protected. 5. Protection of Confidential Material. a. General Protections. Documents designated confidential under this Order
will not be used or disclosed by the parties or counsel for the parties or any other persons identified below (paragraph 5.b.) for any purposes whatsoever other than preparing for and conducting the litigation in which the documents were disclosed (including any appeal of that litigation). b. Limited Third Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties
will not disclose or permit the disclosure of any documents designated confidential under the terms of this Order to any other person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(5) below, and then only after the person to whom disclosure is to be made has executed an acknowledgment (in the form set forth at Attachment A), that he or she has read and understands the terms of this Order and is bound by it. Subject to these requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review documents which have been designated confidential based on this Order: (1) counsel and employees of counsel for the parties who have
responsibility for the preparation and trial of the lawsuit;
parties and employees of a party to this Order but only to the extent
counsel will certify that the specifically named individual party or employee's assistance is necessary to the conduct of the litigation in which the information is disclosed1; (3) court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any,
specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents; (4) consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter referred to
collectively as "experts") employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of the lawsuit; and (5) other persons only upon consent of the producing party or upon order
of the Court and on such conditions as are agreed to or ordered. c. Control of Documents. Counsel for the parties will take reasonable efforts
to prevent unauthorized disclosure of documents designated as confidential based on the terms of this Order. Counsel will maintain a record of those persons, including employees of counsel, who have reviewed or been given access to the documents along with the originals of the forms signed by those persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order. d. Copies. All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions
(hereinafter referred to collectively as "copies"), of documents designated as
At or prior to the time such party or employee completes his or her acknowledgment of review of this Order and agreement to be bound by it (Attachment A), counsel will complete a certification in the form shown at Attachment B. Counsel will retain the certification together with the form signed by the party or employee.
confidential under this Order or any portion of such a document, will be immediately affixed with the designation "CONFIDENTIAL" if the word does not already appear on the copy. All such copies will be afforded the full protection of this Order. 6. Filing of Confidential Materials. In the event a party seeks to file any material that
is subject to protection under this Order with the Court, that party will take appropriate action to insure that the documents receive proper protection from public disclosure including: (1) filing a redacted document with the consent of the party who designated the document as confidential; (2) where appropriate (e.g. in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the documents solely for in camera review; or (3) where the preceding measures are not adequate, seeking permission to file the document under seal. Absent extraordinary circumstances making prior consultation impractical or inappropriate, the party seeking to submit the document to the Court will first consult with counsel for the party who designated the document as confidential to determine if some measure less restrictive than filing the document under seal may serve to provide adequate protection. This duty exists irrespective of the duty to consult on the underlying motion. Nothing in this Order may be construed as a prior directive to the Clerk of Court to allow any document be filed under seal. 7. Greater Protection of Specific Documents. No party may withhold information
from discovery on the ground that it requires protection greater than that afforded by this Order unless the party moves for an Order providing such special protection. 8. to challenge. Challenges to Designation as Confidential. Any confidential designation is subject The following procedures will apply to any such challenge. a. The burden of proving the necessity of a confidential designation remains
with the party asserting confidentiality.
A party who contends that documents designated confidential are not entitled
to confidential treatment will give written notice to the party who affixed the designation of the specific basis for the challenge. The party who so designated the documents will have fifteen (15) days from service of the written notice to determine if the dispute can be resolved without judicial intervention and, if not, to move for an Order confirming the confidential designation. c. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of documents as
confidential, all material previously designated confidential will continue to be treated as subject to the full protections of this Order until one of the following occurs: (1) the party who claims that the documents are confidential withdraws
such designation in writing; (2) the party who claims that the documents are confidential fails to move
timely for an Order designating the documents as confidential as set forth in paragraph 9.b. above; or (3) the Court rules that the documents should no longer be designated as
confidential information. d. Challenges to the confidentiality of documents may be made at any time and
are not waived by the failure to raise the challenge at the time of initial disclosure or designation.
Treatment on Conclusion of Litigation. a. Order Remains in Effect. All provisions of this Order restricting the use of
documents designated confidential will continue to be binding after the conclusion of the litigation unless otherwise agreed or ordered. b. Return of Confidential Documents. Within thirty (30) days after the
conclusion of the litigation, including conclusion of any appeal, all documents treated as confidential under this Order, including copies as defined above (paragraph 5.d.) will be returned to the producing party unless: (1) the document has been entered as evidence or filed (unless introduced or filed under seal); (2) the parties stipulate to destruction in lieu of return; or (3) as to documents containing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving party, that party elects destruction. Notwithstanding the above requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product including an index which refers or relates to information designated confidential so long as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of confidential documents. This work product continues to be confidential under the terms of this Order. An attorney may use his or her work product in a subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose the confidential documents. 10. Order Subject to Modification. This Order will be subject to modification on
motion of any party or any other person who may show an adequate interest in the matter to intervene for purposes of addressing the scope and terms of this Order. The Order will not, however, be modified until the parties will have been given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification.
No Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations and
agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing herein will be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any specific document or item of information designated as confidential by counsel is subject to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise until such time as a document-specific ruling will have been made. 12. Persons Bound. This Order will take effect when entered and will be binding upon:
(1) counsel who signed below and their respective law firms; and (2) their respective clients. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED AND ENTRY REQUESTED BY: QUATTLEBAUM, GROOMS, TULL & BURROW PLLC 111 Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Telephone: (501) 379-1700 Facsimile: (501) 379-1701 Email: email@example.com By: /s/ John E. Tull III John E. Tull III, Ark. Bar No. 84150 Cameron C. McCree, Ark. Bar No. 2007148 Attorneys for Flash Market, Inc. And Sheila F. Campbell Attorney at Law P.O. Box 34007 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Telephone: (501) 374-0700 Facsimile: (501) 372-5375 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org By: /s/ Sheila F. Campbell Sheila F. Campbell, Ark. Bar No. 83239 Attorney for Theressa Bedford
ATTACHMENT A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION THERESSA BEDFORD v. FLASH MARKET, INC. 3:08-CV-00192-SWW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he or she has read the Confidentiality and Protective Order dated December __, 2009, in the above captioned action, understands the terms thereof, and agrees to be bound by such terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Arkansas in matters relating to the Confidentiality and Protective Order and understands that the terms of said Order obligate him or her to use discovery materials designated as confidential solely for the purposes of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such confidential information to any other person, firm or concern. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Confidentiality and Protective Order may result in penalties for contempt of Court. Name: Job Title: Employer: ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ ____________________________________ Signature
ATTACHMENT B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION THERESSA BEDFORD v. FLASH MARKET, INC. CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL OF NEED FOR ASSISTANCE OF PARTY/EMPLOYEE Based on the Confidentiality and Protective Order entered in this action, most particularly the provisions of Paragraph 6.b.2., I certify that the assistance of _________________________ is reasonably necessary to the conduct of this litigation and that this assistance requires the disclosure to this individual of information which has been designated as confidential. I have explained the terms of the Confidentiality and Protective Order to the individual named above and will obtain his or her signature on an "Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to be Bound" prior to releasing any confidential documents to the named individual and I will release only such confidential documents as are reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation. The individual named above is: " A named party; 3:08-CV-00192-SWW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
" An employee of named party ___________________________. This employee's job title is ___________________________ and work address is _______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________. Date: ___________________ ____________________________________ Signature
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?