Pruitt v. Craighead County Detention Center et al

Filing 24

ORDER directing the plaintiff to provide to the court by 8/10/09 notice of his new address and state whether he wishes to proceed with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 7/10/09. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS J O N E S B O R O DIVISION J A M E S JERMAINE PRUITT V S. NO. 3:09CV00046-BD PLAINTIFF C R A I G H E A D COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al. ORDER DEFENDANTS Plaintiff filed this action pro se on April 10, 2009, under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (docket e n try #1). He was granted in forma pauperis status by order (#8) of April 29, 2009. Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated in the Craighead County Detention Facility as e v id e n c e d by mail sent to the Plaintiff, which has been returned to the Court as u n d e liv e ra b le (#22, #23). Plaintiff is directed to provide notice of his new address on or b e f o re August 10, 2009, and state whether he wishes to proceed with this case. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case under L o c a l Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern D is tric t of Arkansas, which requires any party not represented by counsel to notify the C le rk and the other parties promptly of any change in his or her address; to monitor the p ro g re s s of the case; and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. Further, if any c o m m u n ic a tio n from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2009. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?