Sexton et al v. Dotson et al

Filing 91

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 90 Order entered this date, the Sextons' complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/9/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ERNEST B. SEXTON and JOANN SEXTON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 3:09-cv-80-DPM JODY DOTSON, individually and as employee of Lawrence County; DAN ELLISON, individually and as employee of Lawrence County; STATE OF ARKANSAS; LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; and LAWRENCE COUNTY DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Ernest B. Sexton and Joann Sexton's claims against the State of Arkansas the Lawrence County Sheriff's Department, Jody Dotson (official capacity) and Dan Ellison (official capacity) were all dismissed without prejudice. Document Nos. 56, 58 & 90. At the bench trial held 7 September 2011, the Court found in favor of Lawrence County, Jody Dotson (individually), and Dan Ellison (individually) on all Ernest B. Sexton and Joann Sexton's remaining claims. The Court therefore dismisses the Sextons' complaint with prejudice. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 9/9/2011 -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?