Fentress v. Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees & Expenses & awarding Plaintiff $3,417.39 in fees & expenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/23/2010. (jct)

Download PDF
Fentress v. Social Security Administration Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS J O N E S B O R O DIVISION D O N A L D FENTRESS v. CASE NO. 3:09CV00121-BD P L A IN T IF F M I C H A E L J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER P e n d in g is Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal A c c e ss to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412 (docket entry #18). In his motion, P la in tif f requests fees and expenses in the amount of $3,417.39. The Commissioner does n o t object to the amount requested (#20). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion (#18) is G RA N TED . In his motion, Plaintiff states that he has entered into a contract with his counsel in w h ic h he assigned his rights to any EAJA fees and costs and requests that any EAJA fees b e "payable to and mailed directly to his counsel." (#18 at p. 1) In Astrue v. Ratliff, --U .S . ----, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2527, 2010 WL 2346547 (2010), the United States Supreme C o u rt stated, however, that EAJA fees are to be made "payable to litigants." Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded $3,417.39 in fees and expenses. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2010. ___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?