Fitzgerald v. Fairley et al

Filing 8

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 7 Memorandum And Order entered this date, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, and this dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this decision is not in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/9/09. (jct)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION NATHANIEL FITZGERALD v. LINDSEY FAIRLEY, et al. JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, and that this dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this decision is not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2009. 3:09CV00189WRW/HLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

/s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1