Jones v. Clark et al
JUDGMENT, pursuant to 10 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Flores, Silliman, Hunt & Kesraj are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, & the remainder of Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment & and accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/15/10. (jct)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JOSEPH ANTHONY JONES, # 656351 v. CASE NO. 3:09cv00214 BSM/JJV DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
MICHAEL CLARK, Treatment Coordinator, Osceola Department of Community Correction, et al. JUDGMENT
Consistent with the order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Flores, Silliman, Hunt, and Kesraj are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the remainder of plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this judgment and the accompanying order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 15th day of January, 2010. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?