Nixon v. Mills et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 28 Order of Dismissal entered this date, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely & properly comply wit h the Court's 5/12/10 Order. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment & the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 8/20/2010. (jct)

Nixon v. Mills et al

Doc. 29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION RONNIE J. NIXON V. LARRY MILLS, Sheriff of Poinsett County, et al. JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely and properly comply with the Court's May 12, 2010 Order. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment and the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 20th day of August, 2010. 3:10CV00006 WRW/JTR DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

/s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com