Howard v. Poinsett County Jail et al

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, pursuant to Plaintiff's failure to comply with 3 Order, this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further, it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Dismissal & the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/29/2010. (jct)

Howard v. Poinsett County Jail et al

Doc. 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION BOBBY JOE HOWARD PLAINTIFF V. 3:10CV00080 BSM/JTR POINSETT COUNTY JAIL; and JOHN DOES, unknown staff at the Poinsett County Jail ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Bobby Joe Howard ("Howard") has commenced this pro se § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was confined in the Poinsett County Jail. See Doc. No. 2. On April 21, 2010, Howard was directed to file, within thirty (30) days, an Amended Complaint containing information necessary to complete the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See Doc. No. 3. Howard was advised that the failure to timely and properly do so would result in the dismissal of his case, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Id. Howard has failed to comply with the April 21, 2010 order, and the time for doing so has expired. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT

DEFENDANTS

PREJUDICE, due to Howard's failure to timely and properly comply with the April 21, 2010 order. 2. Further, it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma

Dockets.Justia.com

pauperis appeal from this order of dismissal and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29th day of July, 2010.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE