Perry et al v. Busby et al

Filing 15

ORDER of Partial Dismissal, pursuant to Separate Plaintiff Maurio Heron's failure to comply with 7 Order, Plaintiff Heron is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 6/23/2010. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ERIC D. PERRY, and MAURIO HERON V. 3:10CV00097 WRW/JTR DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFFS RICHARD BUSBY, Sheriff, Crittenden County Detention Center, et al. ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL Separate Plaintiff, Maurio Heron, who is confined in the Crittenden County Detention Center, has commenced this pro se 1983 action alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights. See docket entry #2. On May 11, 2010, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff thirty days to: (1) file an Amended Complaint containing information necessary to complete the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. 1915A; and (2) either pay the $350 filing fee in full, or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, along with a prisoner trust fund calculation sheet. See docket entry #7. Importantly, the Court advised Plaintiff that the failure to timely and properly do so would result in the dismissal of his case, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).1 Id. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides that: "It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." (Emphasis added.) 1 On June 6, 2010, Plaintiff filed a prisoner trust fund calculation sheet. Id. However, as of the date of this Order of Partial Dismissal, Plaintiff has not filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or an Amended Complaint. The time for doing so has expired. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), Plaintiff Heron is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to his failure to timely and properly comply with the Court's May 11, 2010 Order. 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 23rd day of June, 2010. /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?