Williams v. Cullom

Filing 10

ORDER directing Plaintiff to file, w/i 30 days of the entry of this Order, a Response to 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sumner Cullom. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely comply with this Order could result in dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/27/2010. (jct)

Download PDF
Williams v. Cullom Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION KARLIS WILLIAMS ADC #110541 V. DR. SUMNER CULLOM 3:10CV00178 DPM/JTR DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF ORDER Defendant, Dr. Sumner Cullom, has filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Supporting Brief arguing that this case should be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See docket entries #8 and #9. The Court concludes that a Response from Plaintiff would be helpful to the resolution of that Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff shall file, within thirty days of the entry of this Order, a Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (docket entry #8). 2. Plaintiff is hereby advised that his failure to timely comply with this Order could result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Dated this 27th day of September, 2010. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1- Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?