Ray et al v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE for 6/8/2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Room 319 of the Federal Building, 615 South Main Street, Jonesboro, Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/21/11. (srw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
GLEN RAY, d/b/a Glen Ray’s Towing and
Recovery, Inc.; MARTY RAY, an
individual; and FRANCISCO MARTINEZ,
CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION, and
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge J. Leon Holmes has referred this case to the undersigned magistrate judge for a
settlement conference, which is scheduled for Wednesday, June 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. at Room 319
Federal Building, 615 South Main Street, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Accordingly, the parties should fully explore and consider settlement at the earliest
opportunity. Early consideration of settlement can prevent unnecessary litigation. This allows the
parties and the taxpayers to avoid the substantial cost, expenditure of time, and stress that are
typically part of the litigation process. Even for those cases that cannot be resolved through
settlement, early consideration of settlement can allow the parties to better understand the factual and
legal nature of their dispute and streamline the issues to be litigated. Consideration of settlement is
a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth
below are the procedures the Court will require the parties to follow and the procedures the Court
typically will employ in conducting the conference.
PRESETTLEMENT CONFERENCE EXCHANGE OF DEMAND AND
OFFER. A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the
parties exchange written settlement proposals.
Therefore, at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the settlement conference, Plaintiff’s
counsel shall submit a written settlement demand containing itemization of damages to
Defendant’s counsel with a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.
No later than fourteen (14) days prior to the settlement conference, Defendant’s counsel
shall submit a written offer to Plaintiff’s counsel with a brief explanation of why such a
settlement is appropriate. On occasion, this process will lead directly to a settlement.
If settlement is not achieved, Plaintiff’s counsel shall deliver or fax copies of all letters to
Judge Volpe’s chambers no later than seven (7) days before the conference. Do not file
copies of these letters or any other settlement-related documents on the court docket.
ATTENDANCE OF PARTIES. Parties with full and complete settlement
authority are required to participate in the conference. An insured corporate party should appear
by a representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to settle the
matter up to a reasonable settlement demand. An uninsured corporate party should appear by a
representative authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to settle the matter up to a reasonable
settlement demand or offer.
MEDIATION FORMAT. The Court will generally use a mediation format – a joint
session with a brief opening by the Court explaining the settlement process, followed by private
caucusing by the Court with each side. The Court expects both the lawyers and the party
representatives to be fully prepared to negotiate in good faith and reach a full and complete
settlement in this case. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess
their previous positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.
STATEMENTS INADMISSIBLE. The Court expects the parties to address each
other with civility, courtesy and respect. Parties are encouraged to be frank and open in their
discussions. As a result, statements made by any party during the settlement conference are not to
be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial. Furthermore, this Court will not
communicate with the trial court about the settlement process except to report whether the case did
or did not settle.
ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED
Parties should be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:
What are your goals in the litigation and what problems would you like to address in
the settlement conference? What do you understand are the opposing side’s goals?
What issues (in and outside of this lawsuit) need to be resolved? What are the
strengths and weaknesses of your case?
Do you understand the opposing side’s view of the case? What is wrong with their
perception? What is right with their perception?
What are the points of agreement and disagreement between the parties? Factual?
What are the impediments to settlement? Financial? Emotional? Legal?
Does settlement or further litigation better enable you to accomplish your goals?
Are there possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute?
Do you have adequate information to discuss settlement? If not, how will you obtain
sufficient information to make a meaningful settlement discussion possible?
Are there outstanding lien holders or third parties who should be invited to
participate in the settlement conference?
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2011.
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?