Ray et al v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al

Filing 18

NOTICE is hereby given to the plaintiffs that the Court will dismiss this action as to defendant Darrell Weiss without prejudice unless proof of service is filed on or before 7/6/11, or the plaintffs establish good cause for the failure to serve summons & complaint on defendant Darrell Weiss w/i 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/6/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION GLEN RAY, d/b/a GLEN RAY’S TOWING & RECOVERY, INC.; MARTY RAY; and FRANCISCO MARTINEZ v. PLAINTIFFS No. 3:10CV00185 JLH CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION and DARRELL WEISS DEFENDANTS NOTICE The complaint in this case was originally filed in the Crittenden County Circuit Court and subsequently removed to this Court by defendant Crete Carrier Corporation on August 11, 2010. More than 120 days have passed. Plaintiffs have not filed proof of service on defendant Darrell Weiss. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period. Notice is hereby given to the plaintiffs that the Court will dismiss this action as to defendant Darrell Weiss without prejudice unless proof of service is filed on or before July 6, 2011, or the plaintiffs establish good cause for the failure to serve summons and complaint on defendant Darrell Weiss within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of June, 2011. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?