Chew v. American Greetings Corporation

Filing 139

ORDER denying Plaintiffs' request for an expedited hearing on their 137 MOTION to set aside judgment. Given that plaintiffs' motion concerns the same issues addressed on summary judgment and that plaintiffs' time to appeal is tolled until disposition of the motion, an expedited hearing is not necessary. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 03/29/2013. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
EUGENE CHEW, JR.
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 3:10CV00199 BSM (Lead Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

DAVID MARK DUNCAN and
NANCY DUNCAN

PLAINTIFFS

v.

CASE NO. 3:10CV00214 BSM (Member Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

DANIEL CHASE HOSKINS and
WHITNEY DALE HOSKINS

PLAINTIFFS

v.

CASE NO. 3:11CV00124 BSM (Member Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

ORDER
Plaintiffs’ request for an expedited hearing on their motion to set aside judgment
[Doc. No. 137] is denied. Given that plaintiffs’ motion concerns the same issues addressed
on summary judgment and that plaintiffs’ time to appeal is tolled until disposition of the
motion, an expedited hearing is not necessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of March 2013.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE