Chew v. American Greetings Corporation

Filing 25

ORDER granting 16 & 18 Motions to Compel filed by American Greetings Corporation. David & Nancy Duncan and Eugene Chew are ordered to produce documents or to fully respond pursuant to this Order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/2/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION EUGENE CHEW, JR. v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:10-cv-00199 BSM AMERICAN GREETINGS CORP. DEFENDANT DAVID MARK DUNCAN and NANCY DUNCAN PLAINTIFFS v. CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00214 BSM AMERICAN GREETINGS CORP. DEFENDANT ORDER Defendant moves to compel [Doc. Nos. 16, 18] responses to interrogatories and requests for document production from plaintiffs. The motion is GRANTED as set forth below: 1. David and Nancy Duncan are ordered to produce the documents in their possession requested in defendant’s request for document production number seven. This includes documents that they did not personally generate. 2. David and Nancy Duncan are ordered to fully respond to defendant’s interrogatory number three. They do not need to produce their particular legal theory, but they must disclose what statutes and regulations they allege the defendant to have violated. 3. David and Nancy Duncan are ordered to respond to defendant’s requests for document production numbers fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen to the extent that they actually possess the documents in question. 4. David and Nancy Duncan are ordered to produce documents pertaining to insurance or other benefits received in connection with the incident alleged in their complaint. 5. Eugene Chew is ordered to produce documents pertaining to insurance or other benefits received in connection with the incident alleged in his complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?