Chew v. American Greetings Corporation

Filing 36

ORDER granting 33 Deft's Motion to Compel as to the Hoskins; granting in part and denying in part 31 Deft's Motion to Compel as to the Duncans. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/8/11. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
EUGENE CHEW, JR.
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 3:10CV00199 BSM (Lead Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

DAVID MARK DUNCAN and
NANCY DUNCAN

PLAINTIFFS

v.

CASE NO. 3:10CV00214 BSM (Member Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

DANIEL CHASE HOSKINS and
WHITNEY DALE HOSKINS

PLAINTIFFS

v.

CASE NO. 3:11CV00124 BSM (Member Case)

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

DEFENDANT

ORDER
Defendant American Greetings Corporation moves to compel responses to its
interrogatories and requests for production from plaintiffs Daniel Hoskins and Whitney
Hoskins [Doc. No. 33]. Defendant also moves to compel responses to its first and second
sets of interrogatories and requests for production from plaintiffs David Duncan and Nancy
Duncan [Doc. No. 31]. The Duncans were previously ordered to respond to the first set
[Doc. No. 25]. The Duncans respond that they have complied with the second request for
production [Doc. No. 35].

Defendant’s motion to compel as to the Hoskins [Doc. No. 33] is granted.
Defendant’s motion to compel as to the Duncans [Doc. No. 31] is granted as to the first set
of interrogatories and request for production as set forth in the earlier order and denied as
moot as to the second set of interrogatories and requests for production. Plaintiffs are hereby
notified that a continued failure to respond to discovery requests may result in sanctions
including, but not limited to, the dismissal of their cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December 2011.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2