Hardy v. Osinowo et al
Filing
194
ORDER granting 127 Defendants' Motion in Limine to exclude testimony relating to Defendant Osinowo not wearing shoes. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/17/2011. (jct)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
DEMETRIUS HARDY
VS.
PLAINTIFF
3:10CV00204JMM
OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG
TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC./
ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY,
AND UNITED VAN LINES, LLC
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Pending is Defendants’ motion in limine to exclude testimony relating to Defendant
Osinowo not wearing shoes. (Docket # 127). Plaintiff has filed a response. For good cause
shown, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. Defendants’ objections to testimony relating to
Osinowo not wearing shoes are sustained.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2011.
______________________________
James M. Moody
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
