Hardy v. Osinowo et al

Filing 214

ORDER denying 53 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Phase One of the trial will be related to Plaintiff's damages only. In Phase Two of the trial, the Court will allow the Plaintiff to present evidence to the jury to support his claim for punitive damges. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/20/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION DEMETRIUS HARDY VS. PLAINTIFF 3:10CV00204JMM OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC./ ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY, AND UNITED VAN LINES, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s claims for compensatory and punitive damages predicated upon theories of negligent hiring, training and supervision and any other claim predicated on any alleged independent act of negligence of Defendant Armstrong Transfer and Storage, Inc./ Armstrong Relocation Company and United Van Lines, LLC. (Docket # 53). Plaintiff has filed a response, Defendants have filed a reply and Plaintiff has filed a supplemental response. For good cause shown, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. By order entered October 4, 2011, the Court denied Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages and ordered that the trial would be bifurcated. Defendants United and Armstrong admitted in their Answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint that Osinowo was their agent and statutory employee and that they are vicariously liable for any negligence of Osinowo. Since the entry of the Court’s bifurcation Order, Defendants United and Armstrong have admitted liability for compensatory damages. In light of this admission, Phase One of the trial will be related to Plaintiff’s damages only. No evidence relative to the Defendants’ alleged negligence, independent or imputed, will be relevant to the determination of compensatory damages. Plaintiff will be permitted to introduce evidence relating to the accident itself only as related to the causation of damages. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to compensatory damages for negligent hiring, training and supervision is denied as moot in light of the admission of liability. In Phase Two of the trial, the court will allow the Plaintiff to present evidence to the jury to support his claim for punitive damages based upon the Defendants’ independent negligence in hiring, training and supervising Osinowo. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2011. ______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?