Hardy v. Osinowo et al
ORDER granting 79 joint MOTION to Continue. The Court will reschedule the case for trial the week of 10/31/11 by separate Order. In light of the new trial date, the following Motions are deemed moot: 66 , 69 , 71 , 73 , 74 & 76 . The Cour t denies without prejudice the following motions in limine: 37 & 43 . Although labeled as a motion in limine, the Court will treat 64 MOTION in Limine to Declare A Portion of Act 649 of 2003 Unconstitutional as substantive motion. Defendant is directed to respond to the motion w/i 30 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/17/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG
TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC./
ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY,
AND UNITED VAN LINES, LLC
Pending is the parties’ joint motion for a continuance. (Docket # 79). For good cause
shown, the motion is GRANTED. The Court will reschedule this case for trial the week of
October 31, 2011 by separate order. In light of the new trial date, the following motions are
deemed moot, docket #’s 66, 69, 71, 73, 74 and 76). The Court denies without prejudice the
following motions in limine, docket #’s 37 and 43. The parties may refile the motions in limine
in accordance with the amended scheduling order if the issues remain disputed at the time of
trial. Although labeled as a motion in limine, the Court will treat Plaintiff’s motion to declare a
portion of Act 649 of 2003 unconstitutional as a substantive motion, docket # 64. Defendant is
directed to respond to the motion within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011.
James M. Moody
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?