Hardy v. Osinowo et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/13/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG
TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC./
ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY,
AND UNITED VAN LINES, LLC
Pending is Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (Docket # 83). For good cause shown, the Court
finds and orders as follows:
Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to Defendant Osinowo’s Driver History
Report is moot.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to an Employee Report Run by
ChoicePoint is denied.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to Defendant United Van Lines Action
/Training Plan is denied.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel Previous Strike Information is granted.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to his request for production of
Defendant Osinowo’s Trip Sheets is granted in part. Defendant is directed to
make three months of trip sheets available for inspection and copying.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part as set forth herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2011.
James M. Moody
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?