Hardy v. Osinowo et al

Filing 97

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/13/2011. (jct)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
DEMETRIUS HARDY
VS.

PLAINTIFF
3:10CV00204JMM

OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG
TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC./
ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY,
AND UNITED VAN LINES, LLC
ORDER

DEFENDANT

Pending is Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (Docket # 83). For good cause shown, the Court
finds and orders as follows:
(1)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to Defendant Osinowo’s Driver History
Report is moot.

(2)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to an Employee Report Run by
ChoicePoint is denied.

(3)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to Defendant United Van Lines Action
/Training Plan is denied.

(4)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel Previous Strike Information is granted.

(5)

Plaintiff’s motion to compel as it relates to his request for production of
Defendant Osinowo’s Trip Sheets is granted in part. Defendant is directed to
make three months of trip sheets available for inspection and copying.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part as set forth herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2011.

______________________________
James M. Moody
United States District Judge